Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-10.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The antibacterial effect of xanthorrhizol as an endodontic irrigant on Enterococcus faecalis

J Korean Dent Assoc > Volume 54(3); 2016 > Article
The Journal of The Korean Dental Association 2016;54(3):206-216.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2016.54.3.004    Published online March 31, 2016.
The antibacterial effect of xanthorrhizol as an endodontic irrigant on Enterococcus faecalis
Wonyoung Yue1, Minju Song2, Si-Mook Kang3, Baek-il Kim4, Tai-Cheol Yoon5, Euiseong Kim6
1Microscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University
2Division of Constitutive & Regenerative Sciences Section of Restorative Dentistry, UCLA School of Dentistry
3Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK 21 Plus Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University
4Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK 21 Plus Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University
5Deptartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
6Microscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of xanthorrhizol (XTZ) on E. faecalis, compared with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX). Materials and Methods Normal physiological state (NS), starvation state (SS), and alkalization state (AS) of E. faecalis were used. A solution containing 1% XTZ in 30% ethanol, 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 100 mg/ml sodium methyl cocoyl taurate was used and is referred to as Xan in this study. To determine the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Xan and CHX, 500µl of E. faecalis (NS and two stress states) was added to a microtube containing 500µl of serial 2-fold dilutions of 1% Xan and 2% CHX (1:2-1:128). The MBC of each antimicrobial was determined by the plate count method. Results The antibacterial effect of Xan was more effective on E. faecalis in AS than in the other states (NS, SS) at 0.125% Xan and 0.03325% Xan (P<0.05). In contrast, the antibacterial effect of CHX was more effective against E. faecalis in SS than the other states (NS, AS) at 0.0625% CHX (P<0.05). In SS, the antibacterial effect of CHX was more effective than that of Xan at 0.125% and 0.0625% (P<0.05). However, in AS, the antibacterial effect of Xan was more effective than that of CHX at 0.0625% and 0.03325% (P<0.05). Conclusions In endodontic retreatment cases in which it is important to effectively remove E. faecalis from the infected root canal, Xan may be more suitable when combined with NaOCl than CHX.
Key Words: Xanthorrhizol;chlorhexidine;root canal irrigation;E. faecalis;


Editorial Office
Korean Dental Association, 257 Gwangnaru-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04802, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2024-9100   Fax: +82-2-468-4655/58   

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Dental Association.

Developed in M2PI