Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Retrograde Peri-Implantitis Associated with Adjacent Apical Periodontitis: a Case Report

J Korean Dent Assoc > Volume 58(6); 2020 > Article
The Journal of The Korean Dental Association 2020;58(6):336-345.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2020.58.6.002    Published online June 30, 2020.
Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Retrograde Peri-Implantitis Associated with Adjacent Apical Periodontitis: a Case Report
Kwan-Joo Lee1, Young Woo Song2, Ui-Won Jung3, Jae-Kook Cha4
1Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry
2Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry
3Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry
4Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry
Abstract
Peri-apical implant lesion, also known as 'retrograde peri-implantitis' can occur with multifactorial etiological factors. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate resolution of periapical implant lesion by removal of causative factors and saving implant by regenerative therapy. A 54-year old male patient with mild dull pain around implant on the right mandibular second premolar area due to persistent peri-apical infection of the adjacent first premolar was treated. Extraction of tooth with symptomatic apical periodontitis and regenerative therapy on the buccal fenestration area of the implant and extraction site were performed. After 6-month reentry, notable regenerated bone tissue around implant was found, and implant placement on the previous extraction site was performed. After 14-month follow-up from the regenerative therapy, neither biological nor mechanical complication could be found around the implant, evidenced by high implant stability, normal clinical probing depth, and absence of discomfort spontaneously and during masticatory function. In conclusion, surgical intervention including regenerative therapy using bone graft and barrier membrane on periapical implant lesion can be suggested as one of the treatment options considering the extent of periapical lesion.
Key Words: bone regeneration;case report;dental implant;periapical lesion;peri-implantitis;


Editorial Office
Korean Dental Association, 257 Gwangnaru-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04802, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2024-9100   Fax: +82-2-468-4655/58   

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Dental Association.

Developed in M2PI