A study on dental instrument reprocessing management system based on wireless ICT and RFID technology

Article information

J Korean Dent Assoc. 2026;64(3):101-110
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2026.64.3.005
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Daejeon, Korea
2FPMed Healthcare Corporation, Wonju, Korea
3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sugary, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
4Yonsei Gounmiso Dental Clinic, Seongnam, Korea
5Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Korea
*Corresponding author: : Prof. Hye-Sook Choi Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University, 815 Gyeonhwon-ro, Munmak-eup, Wonjusi, Gangwon-do 26495, Korea Tel: +82-33-738-1304, E-mail: chs@kduniv.ac.kr

This research was supported by the Regional Innovation System and Education program through the Gangwon RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education and the Gangwon State, Korea (2025-RISE-10-003).

Received 2025 December 31; Revised 2026 February 3; Accepted 2026 February 25.

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to implement a dental instrument reprocessing management system based on wireless ICT and RFID technology and evaluate its operational efficiency and applicability in the dental clinical setting. Materials and

Methods

For the development of the instrument reprocessing system, hardware components including RFID tags, RFID readers, wireless internet devices, and a central server were integrated with software management programs. Once operational, the system collected information in real-time at each stage of the reprocessing workflow. System performance was evaluated in terms of stability, efficiency, and data accuracy.

Results

During pilot operation, the system automatically recorded the reprocessing history of each instrument in chronological order. Functions such as verification of sterilization completion, real-time status monitoring, error detection in sterilization, and validity management were successfully implemented. Compared to traditional paper-based recording, instances of missing records and errors were significantly reduced, and rapid traceability was enabled in case of suspected infection events.

Conclusion

The RFID-based dental instrument reprocessing management system can overcome limitations in repetitive and complex reprocessing workflows in dental practice, enhance operational efficiency, and provide tangible support for improving infection control standards.

Introduction

Medical devices reused in clinical settings must undergo thorough cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization processes to prevent cross-infection between patients [1,2]. Inadequate execution of these reprocessing procedures can increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [3-5]. In particular, dental practice often involves the repeated use of small, precise instruments that come into direct contact with blood and bodily fluids [1,6], making the accuracy and consistency of sterilization processes critical for patient safety and infection prevention [7,8].

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) mandates the establishment of standard operating procedures (SOP) for instrument reprocessing, specifying systematic management of cleaning, sterilization, storage, and use [9]. However, in actual clinical settings, it is challenging to verify in real-time whether each process is conducted according to SOP or to systematically review the reprocessing history of individual instruments afterward. Widely used paper-based or handwritten records are prone to omissions and errors due to increased workload [10], and it is difficult to instantly confirm the sterilization status or usage history of specific instruments.

As an alternative to overcome these limitations, recent clinical settings have focused on instrument management methods utilizing Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) technology [11-14]. RFID is a contactless technology that uses radio waves to identify and track objects, enabling automatic recognition of instruments without individual scanning or visual inspection [15-17]. The efficiency of this technology has been validated in logistics and inventory management [18], and its potential application to the tracking and infection control of repeatedly used medical devices has been suggested [19,20].

An RFID-based sterilization and instrument management system can continuously record and manage the entire cycle, from the collection of contaminated instruments to cleaning, sterilization, storage, and reuse. This allows for rapid identification and traceability in case of issues during sterilization, enhancing reliability in the reprocessing workflow, and potentially contributing to an overall improvement in infection control standards. Nevertheless, the application of wireless ICT-based systems integrated with RFID for dental instrument reprocessing remains limited.

Therefore, this study aimed to implement a dental instrument reprocessing management system utilizing wireless communication–based ICT (information and communication technology) and RFID technologies, and to examine its operational efficiency and practical applicability by evaluating its performance through simulations conducted in a controlled laboratory environment.

Materials and Methods

The dental instrument reprocessing management system proposed in this study is an integrated system that utilizes wireless ICT and RFID technologies to automatically record and manage the entire workflow of dental instruments, including cleaning, sterilization, storage, and use.

The system consists of hardware components (RFID tags, RFID readers, wireless internet devices, and server/cloud) and software (management program). All components are interconnected to enable real-time collection, transmission, and storage of information at each stage of instrument movement and processing (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Architecture of an RFID-Based Instrument Management System for Real-Time Tracking and Processing

RFID tags attached to sterilized instruments or instrument sets identify each item based on unique identification information. Each stage of the workflow including the start and end of cleaning, storage, and actual use is automatically recognized by RFID readers. The captured data are transmitted to a central server via a wireless network, where the processing history is accumulated and stored.

RFID is a contactless technology that uses radio waves to identify objects. In this study, RFID was applied as a key component to enable automatic tracking and management of dental instrument reprocessing history.

RFID tags were attached to dental instruments or instrument sets (trays) and assigned unique identification numbers (IDs). Since most dental instruments are composed of metallic materials such as stainless steel, metal interference is a major factor affecting RFID signal performance. In this study, on-metal RFID tags (metal tags) were used to minimize metal interference. In addition, the tags were designed to withstand repeated use without physical damage or data loss under the high-temperature and high-pressure conditions of steam sterilization (autoclave) as well as the vibration and humidity conditions of ultrasonic cleaning.

Sterilized instruments were organized as sets, with RFID tags attached to allow batch recognition (Fig. 2). Small RFID tags were also attached to individual dental instruments, enabling instrument-level management (Fig. 3). Since the RFID ICs were attached to steel containers and trays, IC chips specifically designed for strong performance on metal surfaces were applied to prevent wireless communication interference. In addition, the mounting position of the IC tags was adjusted so that the metal instruments themselves could be utilized as antennas, thereby improving communication performance.

Figure 2.

A. RFID Tag. B. RFID tag attached to the outside of the sterilized tray. C. RFID tag attached inside the sterilized tray.

Figure 3.

A. Small RFID chip attached to the surgical instrument. B. Enlarged view of the RFID attachment site: does not interfere with instrument use.

RFID readers detect RFID tags throughout the entire instrument movement pathway. Two types of readers can be applied fixed and mobile (handheld). The system allows not only batch scanning of instrument sets but also selective scanning of individual instruments.

By applying RFID technology, the cleaning, sterilization, storage, and usage history of sterilized instruments are automatically recorded in real time, eliminating the need for manual documentation (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

A. RFID chip and handheld RFID reader. B. Tagging RFID chips attached to the outside of the tray using a handheld RFID reader. C. Handheld RFID reader stored on a stand.

In this system, the wireless internet equipment is responsible for real-time data transmission between the RFID readers and the central server (or cloud server). Considering the characteristics of the dental clinic environment, a Wi-Fi-based wireless network was implemented, and access points (APs) were strategically installed in areas with frequent instrument movement, such as the central supply room, treatment rooms (operating rooms), and sterilization room, to ensure stable wireless communication (Fig. 5). The operating frequency band of the RFID tags used in this study was ultra-high frequency (UHF) at 918 MHz.

Figure 5.

A. RFID system communication equipment. B. Spectrum Analyzer (RFID UHF tag frequency range measurement).

Through the wireless network, information is immediately transmitted to the central server. In the event of network failure, data are temporarily stored in local memory to minimize data loss and maintain continuity of instrument reprocessing records.

Moreover, the wireless network incorporates authentication-based access control and encrypted communication to enhance security, preventing leakage of patient information and sterilization history data. This wireless internet configuration allows real-time monitoring of instrument status in dental clinical settings and enables efficient infection control and instrument tracking management without location constraints.

The management program (Den-win) processes data collected from the hardware and provides information according to user requirements. The status of sterilized instruments is intuitively displayed as “In Use,” “Being Washed,” “Sterilization Completed,” “In Storage,” or “Expired.” This allows medical staff and sterilization personnel to monitor instrument status in real time without manual record-keeping.

Additionally, information such as sterilization method, date and time, and personnel in charge is automatically linked and managed. The system provides administratorlevel functions, including user access control, log review, and statistical analysis. These features enable analysis of management indicators such as instrument usage frequency, time required for sterilization processes, and record omissions (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

RFID system management software (development version, not a commercially released program).

In this study, we conducted simulations in a controlled laboratory environment to evaluate the performance of the dental instrument reprocessing management system developed using wireless ICT and RFID. The equipment used in the experiments is listed in Table 1.

List of equipment

A total of six simulation runs were performed, and the cycle evaluation method was as follows. At each process step—cleaning, inspection, packaging, and sterilization— RFID tags were read to assess whether the system was operating correctly. Next, at the sterilization completion, storage management, and usage stages, RFID tags were read to verify that state changes were correctly recorded. Collected data were analyzed to confirm the accuracy of processing history and status changes, as well as to identify any missing records.

The results were evaluated in terms of system stability, operational efficiency, and information accuracy, and the records for each process step were checked for con-sistency with actual workflow. The evaluation items are listed in Table 2.

System evaluation items and procedures

Results

As a result of system operation, usage information was successfully visualized for all cycles, and the data were properly stored on the server. The system functionality was evaluated through 10 RFID tag readings using the reader, and all trials were completed without errors, confirming proper system operation (Table 3). The system also maintained correct functionality after 10 repeated sterilization cycles.

System stability evaluation

Upon application of the system to the instrument cleaning and sterilization processes, the status information of the instruments (Cleaning, Sterilizing, Sterilized, Stored, and In Use) was automatically updated (Fig. 7). Before clinical use, the system verified that only sterilized instruments within their valid period were available. After procedures, RFID recognition recorded the usage history of each instrument on the server. This implementation streamlined staff tasks and enabled automated and standardized tracking of instrument reprocessing (Table 4).

Figure 7.

Instrument reprocessing process and application of RFID technology.

Comparison before and after system implementation

Furthermore, a signal interference avoidance algorithm was applied to minimize radio interference and collisions, enabling the collection of data for instrument sets without recognition errors. The installation position and angle of the antennas also played a critical role in reducing interference. Additionally, the system was designed to absorb and redistribute energy reflected from metal surfaces, thereby enhancing sensitivity.

Discussion

This study aimed to explore ways to enhance the reliability of infection control and improve workflow efficiency by systematically managing the reprocessing history of dental instruments using RFID technology.

The results demonstrated that applying RFID technology enabled the real-time automatic recording of each instrument’s cleaning, sterilization, storage, and usage history, which can improve transparency and traceability in the instrument reprocessing workflow. Healthcare facilities are required to document and retain sterilization logs and ensure the quality of sterilization processes [21-23]. However, previous studies have reported that sterilization logs are often not recorded or retained, and in cases where issues arise during sterilization, procedures for recalling already distributed instruments are insufficient [10,24]. The RFID technology proposed in this study can automatically record and track the complete reprocessing history, addressing these issues effectively.

Previous research has consistently highlighted the limitations of manual recordkeeping, including spatial, searchability, and preservation issues, emphasizing the need for systematic sterilization documentation [25,26]. The RFID-based system proposed here automates instrument reprocessing records, reducing reliance on manual documentation, minimizing errors and omissions, and enabling rapid and accurate traceability in case of suspected infections. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 10% of hospitalized patients experience healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [27]. Applying this system in clinical practice could prevent infections caused by improper instrument use and allow prompt response in suspected cases.

The core functionality of the proposed system automatically records the processing history of each instrument at every stage cleaning, sterilization, storage, and usage and stores the information in a database in chronological order. Each instrument is managed with a unique identification number, and scanning the tag attached to an instrument or set intuitively displays the current status, such as “In Use,” “Cleaning,” “Sterilized,” “In Storage,” or “Expired.” This enables medical staff and sterilization personnel to monitor instrument status in real time without manual recordkeeping. Automation via RFID reduces staff workload, ensures smooth instrument turnover, and enhances clinical efficiency.

The system also allows administrators to set user-specific access permissions and utilize statistical analysis features. Unlike paper records, which are cumbersome to process, data stored in the server can be analyzed for monthly, quarterly, or yearly trends, supporting resource allocation and management strategies for infection control.

However, the initial investment cost for implementing an RFID system cannot be overlooked. The expenses associated with RFID tags, readers, and server infrastructure are significant, and careful consideration is required for clinical application. Nevertheless, the adoption of an RFID system is expected to provide economic benefits in various aspects, including labor cost reduction, improved operational efficiency through decreased recording errors, and reduced social and economic costs associated with infection incidents.

This study has several limitations. First, it was limited to the performance evaluation of RFID tags (chips) through simulations conducted in a controlled laboratory environment, and therefore, additional quantitative metrics are required to support its application in actual clinical settings. Second, the system’s capability for evaluating the performance of equipment required for instrument reprocessing was minimal; future work should integrate Internet of Things (IoT) technology to extend functionality, including monitoring the physical status of equipment. Third, the evaluation was based on short-term experiments, and further assessment is needed to examine the durability and lifespan of the equipment under prolonged use.

In conclusion, the wireless ICT- and RFID-based dental instrument reprocessing management system proposed in this study addresses the limitations of traditional manual and paper-based management methods and demonstrates the potential for systematic management of cleaning and sterilization histories in dental clinical settings. RFID-based automated recording and traceability allow real-time monitoring of instrument status, providing a foundation for improving infection control and ensuring patient safety. Long-term operational data analysis and IoT-enabled feature expansion could further establish a digital infection control system tailored for dental healthcare environments.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None

References

1. Ibrahim NK, Alwafi HA, Sangoof SO, Turkistani AK, Alattas BM. Cross-infection and infection control in dentistry: knowledge, attitude and practice of patients attended dental clinics in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health 2017;10:438–445.
2. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Modern advances in disinfection, sterilization, and medical waste management. In: Wenzel RP. Prevention and control of nosocomial infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p.542-574.
3. Baxter RL, Baxter HC, Campbell GA, Grant K, Jones A, Richardson P, et al. Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination on reprocessed surgical instruments. J Hosp Infect 2006;63:439–444.
4. Dancer SJ, Stewart M, Coulombe C, Gregori A, Virdi M. Surgical site infections linked to contaminated surgical instruments. J Hosp Infect 2012;81:231–238.
5. Tosh PK, Disbot M, Duffy JM, Boom ML, Heseltine G, Srinivasan A, et al. Outbreak of pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical site infections after arthroscopic procedures: Texas, 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:1179–1186.
6. Györfi A, Fazekas A. Significance of infection control in dentistry: a review. Fogorv Sz 2007;100:141–152.
7. Ling ML, Ching P, Widitaputra A, Stewart A, Sirijindadirat N, Thu LTA. APSIC guidelines for disinfection and sterilization of instruments in health care facilities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018;7:25.
8. Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramanium M. Comprehensive review and comparison of the disinfection techniques currently available in the literature. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e849–e856.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection prevention and control in dental settings [Internet]. Atlanta: CDC; c2016 [cited 2025 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dental-infection-control/hcp/index.html.
10. Kim SH, Maeng MH, Kim HJ, Choi HS. Analysis of sterilization record management in dental clinic. J Korean Dent Assoc 2025;63:234–242.
11. Yoshikawa T, Kimura E, Akama E, Nakao H, Yorozuya T, Ishihara K. Prediction of the service life of surgical instruments from the surgical instrument management system log using radio frequency identification. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:695.
12. Kusuda K, Yamashita K, Ohnishi A, Tanaka K, Komino M, Honda H, et al. Management of surgical instruments with radio frequency identification tags: a 27-month in hospital trial. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2016;29:236–247.
13. Hill I, Olivere L, Helmkamp J, Le E, Hill W, Wahlstedt J, et al. Measuring intraoperative surgical instrument use with radio-frequency identification. JAMIA Open 2022;5:ooac003.
14. Profetto L, Gherardelli M, Iadanza E. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) in health care: where are we? A scoping review. Health Technol (Berl) 2022;12:879–891.
15. Lakafosis V, Rida A, Vyas R, Yang L, Nikolaou S, Tentzeris MM. Progress towards the first wireless sensor networks consisting of inkjet-printed, paper-based RFID-enabled sensor tags. Proc IEEE 2010;98:1601–1609.
16. López-Soriano S, Parrón J. Wearable RFID tag antenna for healthcare applications. In: 2015 IEEE APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC) 2015; 287-290.
17. Choi BS, Lee JW, Lee JJ, Park KT. A hierarchical algorithm for indoor mobile robot localization using RFID sensor fusion. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2011;58:2226–2235.
18. Weinstein R. RFID: A technical overview and its application to the enterprise. IT Prof 2005;7:27–33.
19. Occhiuzzi C, Paggi C, Marrocco G. Passive RFID strain-sensor based on meander-line antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 2011;59:4836–4840.
20. Dey S, Saha JK, Karmakar NC. Smart sensing: Chipless RFID solutions for the Internet of Everything. IEEE Microw Mag 2015;16:26–39.
21. Chanchareonsook N, Ling ML, Sim QX, Teoh KH, Tan K, Tan BH, et al. Failure of sterilization in a dental outpatient facility: investigation, risk assessment, and management. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101e29815.
22. Laneve E, Raddato B, Dioguardi M, Di Gioia G, Troiano G, Lo Muzio L. Sterilisation in dentistry: a review of the literature. Int J Dent 2019;:6507286.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sterilizing practices guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities [Internet]. Atlanta: CDC; c2008 [cited 2025 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/disinfection-sterilization/sterilizingpractices.html?utm.
24. Jeong SY, Choi JH, Kim EK, Kim SM, Son HJ, Cho NH, et al. Actual disinfection and sterilization control in Korean healthcare facilities. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs 2014;21:392–402.
25. Whyte M. Computerised versus handwritten records. Paediatr Nurs 2005;17:15–18.
26. Basu D, Bag SC, Das A, Razario JD. The importance of paper records and their preservation period in a Central Sterile Supply Department: an experience from a oncology center in eastern India. J Infect Public Health 2017;10:685–687.
27. World Health Organization. World Hand Hygiene Day: Key facts and figures [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2026 Mar 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/campaigns/world-hand-hygiene-day/keyfacts-and-figures.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Architecture of an RFID-Based Instrument Management System for Real-Time Tracking and Processing

Figure 2.

A. RFID Tag. B. RFID tag attached to the outside of the sterilized tray. C. RFID tag attached inside the sterilized tray.

Figure 3.

A. Small RFID chip attached to the surgical instrument. B. Enlarged view of the RFID attachment site: does not interfere with instrument use.

Figure 4.

A. RFID chip and handheld RFID reader. B. Tagging RFID chips attached to the outside of the tray using a handheld RFID reader. C. Handheld RFID reader stored on a stand.

Figure 5.

A. RFID system communication equipment. B. Spectrum Analyzer (RFID UHF tag frequency range measurement).

Figure 6.

RFID system management software (development version, not a commercially released program).

Figure 7.

Instrument reprocessing process and application of RFID technology.

Table 1.

List of equipment

Item Brand
RFID tag A prototype product, not yet commercially available
RFID reader A prototype product, not yet commercially available
Communication equipment A prototype product, not yet commercially available
Instrument with a small RFID tag attached A prototype product, not yet commercially available
Sterilization tray Sterile container systems (B. Braun Melsungen SE, Melsungen, Germany)
Sterilizer (autoclave) Getinge (Getinge AB, Gothenburg, Sweden)
Ultrasonic cleaner Getinge (Getinge AB, Gothenburg, Sweden)

Table 2.

System evaluation items and procedures

Process System evaluation Result
Instrument reprocessing Cleaning room Tray scan → linked with cleaning equipment cycle to record cleaning completion time Normal
Inspection Generates warning message if items are missing Normal
Packaging Stores sterilization information (autoclave ID, scheduled cycle, operator) Normal
Sterilization Stores sterilization cycle number, start/end time, conditions (temperature, pressure) Normal
Usage history management Sterilization completed Generates status message “Sterilized – Ready for Use” Normal
Storage Displays sterilization validity period (warning if expired) Normal
Use Stores actual usage information (operator, treatment room, patient info) Normal
Post-use Stores end-of-use time, status message changes to “Use Completed – Awaiting Cleaning” Normal

Table 3.

System stability evaluation

Item Instrument Count Success rate Tray Count Success rate
Instrument reprocessing Cleaning room 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Inspection 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Packaging 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Sterilization 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Usage history management Sterilization completed 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Storage 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Use 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)
Post-use 10 10 100 (100.0) 5 10 50 (100.0)

Table 4.

Comparison before and after system implementation

Category As-is (conventional method) To-be (proposed system)
History management Manual entry (prone to omission, errors, loss) Automatic system entry (stored in server)
Sterilized items management Recorded individually for each sterilized item Uses digital records (set-based registration)
Sterilization process monitoring Unable to track sterilization process Able to track each sterilization process step
Usage status Manual record (paper log management) Digital registration (real-time status monitoring)
Usage history review Check paper log Real-time retrieval of usage history (DB search)